User avatar
rogerver
Founder
Founder
Posts: 1868
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:55 am

Donate BTC of your choice to 1PpmSbUghyhgbzsDevqv1cxxx8cB2kZCdP

Contact: Website Twitter

Full blocks will lead to far more centralization than big blocks.

Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/690224920941309954

I think this is true for the following reason:

With small blocks there is a limit to how many traditional on chain transactions can fit.
If more people want to use Bitcoin than this size block can accommodate, users will be forced onto off chain systems that may occasionally sync with the Bitcoin blockchain. We can already see this with Coinbase to Coinbase transactions that never hit the Bitcoin block chain.
Those transactions are not censorship resistant, nor are they distributed. (I still think Coinbase is a wonderful service, and there is an important role for centralized systems)

I'm all in favor of technologies that can help fit additional transactions into the block chain per MB of storage, but as someone who started out my career selling 8MB memory modules for $650 each, and seeing those same modules today being literal garbage, I'm not worried at all about the blockchain growing to be much much larger than today. A single photo taken with the new iPhone is nearly 8MB. I don't see a problem with a single block being the same size.
Help spread Bitcoin by linking to everything mentioned here:
topic7039.html

iFixBTCmemoryIssues
Gold Bitcoiner
Gold Bitcoiner
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2015 9:03 pm

Re: Full blocks will lead to far more centralization than big blocks.

Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:06 pm

https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/690224920941309954

I think this is true for the following reason:

With small blocks there is a limit to how many traditional on chain transactions can fit.
If more people want to use Bitcoin than this size block can accommodate, users will be forced onto off chain systems that may occasionally sync with the Bitcoin blockchain. We can already see this with Coinbase to Coinbase transactions that never hit the Bitcoin block chain.
Those transactions are not censorship resistant, nor are they distributed. (I still think Coinbase is a wonderful service, and there is an important role for centralized systems)

I'm all in favor of technologies that can help fit additional transactions into the block chain per MB of storage, but as someone who started out my career selling 8MB memory modules for $650 each, and seeing those same modules today being literal garbage, I'm not worried at all about the blockchain growing to be much much larger than today. A single photo taken with the new iPhone is nearly 8MB. I don't see a problem with a single block being the same size.
Exactly, even if each block were 32MB, we would find a way :)
Image

If you are running a version of Bitcoin Core, stop using it. Upgrade to Bitcoin Unlimited or Classic immediately.

Fix Your Unconfirmed Transaction.

Vote for the future of our Bitcoin network!

Return to “Bitcoin Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests