This is Bitcoin's mempool since the beginning of the year. You see a fake/manufactured backlog since May.

[SpaceMonkey]

Thx for stopping this Roger (and Jihan too of course). Now you can buy your coffee again

[Fremont]

Thx for stopping this Roger (and Jihan too of course). Now you can buy your coffee again

There is no such thing as a 'fake' backlog in the mempool. Transactions are either there or they are not. Transactions have been there, thus they were not fake. As an aside your childish remarks show up your immaturity, LiteCoinGuy.

Please also provide proof - something that you always find impossible to do - that the backlog in the mempool was 'manufactured' as you seem to allude to.

[SpaceMonkey]

https://twitter.com/SDWouters/status/878241578757890048

[grabberfish]

These graphs show me that users want bitcoin to grow, but something keeps holding back that process from taking place. I see this:

• Interest builds
• Congestion occurs
• Prices rise
• Users drop off
• Rinse and repeat

If the block size limit was even just set to a proportionally similar level as Satoshi's in 2010 then things would be different. The block size limit and all who support 1MB blocks are anti-bitcoin and everything it stands for.

[Fremont]

https://twitter.com/SDWouters/status/878241578757890048

Are you going to provide some proof that those transactions are "manufactured" or just post a person's opinion again with no empirical proof to back up the silly statements you're making?