My transaction is not getting confirmed!

[Icedwhisper]

Hi, so I sent 0.01173022 BTC to my other wallet, but apparently, they are not getting processed even with Fee rate per byte of 102.967 sat/B! What is wrong here!

https://blockchain.info/tx/9f534bc32a53 ... 4d75f373dc

Please I'm very worried. What can I do to make them pass? I used BTC.com wallet to send the fees. Thanks!

[grabberfish]

Hi, so I sent 0.01173022 BTC to my other wallet, but apparently, they are not getting processed even with Fee rate per byte of 102.967 sat/B! What is wrong here!

https://blockchain.info/tx/9f534bc32a53 ... 4d75f373dc

Please I'm very worried. What can I do to make them pass? I used BTC.com wallet to send the fees. Thanks!

Delayed transactions have become an increasing problem in the bitcoin world due to a cartel who wish to block growth of transaction volumes. Some community-minded persons have implemented some tools to help facilitate the processing of stuck transactions. You can find such here: https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ This service has limits of 100 transaction per hour accepted for processing, but you should be able to get in there.

To help the ability to process more transactions on-chain, please support bigger blocks.

[Bitmxittz]

https://blockchain.info/en/charts/mempool-size
mempool size over 54 mb.

[LiteCoinGuy]

We could already have 2MB blocks and LN but Roger Ver and Jihan Wu Mining Cartel are blocking progress since months. They should held accountable for the delay and the suppressed bitcoin price.

That is the reason we will make a UASF.

[grabberfish]

Hello, mate.

We could already have 2MB blocks and LN but Roger Ver and Jihan Wu Mining Cartel are blocking progress since months. They should held accountable for the delay and the suppressed bitcoin price.

LCG, let's discuss this:

• 2MB blocks are not on Core's table today.
• Lightning Network is vapourware that has no demonstrable environment today - routing is still not functional.

Moving to non-technical issues...

• Roger Ver and Jihan Wu Mining Cartel are blocking progress since months.

Not supporting something does not mean blocking. In fact, if you care about progress, you should therefore support BU as it has more trigger support than SegWit. BU (by that I am referring to Emergent Consensus) needs a lower percentage of mining support to activate than SegWit.

That is the reason we will make a UASF.

Cool. I look forward to such taking place, but that will only result in the UASF clients creating their own failing fork. Unless the fork changes multiple factors, such as difficulty and perhaps proof-of-work, then it will fail. The ETH/ETC comparison is a false analogy because they have fundamentally different dynamics. Bitcoin's design means that there is almost no chance for a minority chain to survive because of the greed aspect.

I really hope we can all come together again when the dust has settled.

[roober]

Hi, I also have a delay transaction today, more than 20 hours.

[bitkilo]

Hi, I also have a delay transaction today, more than 20 hours.

Can you please provide the transaction ID so someone can look into this for you.

Check the fee size on the tx, it is most likely set too low and that is why your transaction has not confirmed yet. The fee should be set to about 280 sat per byte.

[roober]

Hi, I also have a delay transaction today, more than 20 hours.

Can you please provide the transaction ID so someone can look into this for you.

Check the fee size on the tx, it is most likely set too low and that is why your transaction has not confirmed yet. The fee should be set to about 280 sat per byte.

https://blockchain.info/tx/42dec5529a93 ... 3958a234f0

[bitkilo]

Hi, I also have a delay transaction today, more than 20 hours.

Can you please provide the transaction ID so someone can look into this for you.

Check the fee size on the tx, it is most likely set too low and that is why your transaction has not confirmed yet. The fee should be set to about 280 sat per byte.

https://blockchain.info/tx/42dec5529a93 ... 3958a234f0

Just as I suspected the fee for this transaction is set too low (120.44sat/byte)
The fee should have been set to at least 280sat/byte for a quick confirmation. Use this site to check the optimal fee to set for future transactions: https://bitcoinfees.21.co/

[rogerver]

A bit more information on why this problem exists can be read here.

It is a completely avoidable problem but Blockstream is intentionally crippling how bitcoin has always worked, in an attempt to force users onto THEIR solutions for the problems they have created.

[helmo]

Try but will they ever succeed. Hopefully not.

[farhan236]

If you're a daily Bitcoin user who sends and receives coins oftentimes likelihood is that that you just have run into a dealing that didn’t ensure at once successive block. There area unit 2 main reasons why a Bitcoin dealing is also unfinished, the primary is that the dealing is invalid and was created fraudulently, since the signature doesn’t match with the corresponding key the network rejects the dealing all at once. the opposite commonest reason that a dealing isn’t confirming is as a result of the sender sent too low of a miners fee.

[edita]

just wait!
طرق الربح من الانترنت

[mjglqw]

This can also depend on the transaction fee you chose. Might be too low im afraid.