Why Bitcoin Unlimited should be correctly classified as an ‘attempted robbery’ of Bitcoin, not a fork
Looking into the history of open source project forks, I finally figured out (I can’t claim to be the first, but I haven’t seen others say it) that forks do not try to steal the names of their parents.
https://medium.com/@Coinosphere/why-bit ... .oedv93kkz
-
LiteCoinGuy
- Gold Bitcoiner
- Posts: 2505
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2015 9:00 am
[2017-03-17] Why Bitcoin Unlimited should be correctly classified as an ‘attempted robbery’ of Bitcoin, not a fork
********************************************
More informations about Bitcoin and scaling BTC on
bitcoin.org/en/
https://bitcoincore.org/en/2015/12/23/c ... reases-faq
&
reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/
More informations about Bitcoin and scaling BTC on
bitcoin.org/en/
https://bitcoincore.org/en/2015/12/23/c ... reases-faq
&
reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/
Re: [2017-03-17] Why Bitcoin Unlimited should be correctly classified as an ‘attempted robbery’ of Bitcoin, not a fork
I had to laugh at the picture comment in the article "Here we see a Bitcoin Unlimited Dev in his natural habitat" it the same pic any site shows when talking about hackers or darkweb.
I understand what the article is getting at but nobody has rights to the bitcoin name as far as i know.
I understand what the article is getting at but nobody has rights to the bitcoin name as far as i know.
Please help Ross and his family during this hard time by donating to the https://freeross.org/ fund.
Play at the best provably fair Bitcoin games site here:
games.bitcoin.com
Need a fantastic Bitcoin wallet
Pick up some great Bitcoin.com swag here
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests