Do you think that if RBF is adopted it will needlessly imposes extra development costs on existing merchants?
To vote on this topic just follow the link https://vote.bitcoin.com/arguments/rbf- ... -merchants
The 2 messages you have a choice of signing regarding this topic are below:
I believe that RBF (Replace-By-Fee) policy should NOT be adopted because it breaks 0-conf transactions and needlessly imposes extra development costs on existing merchants
Or
I doubt that RBF (Replace-By-Fee) policy should NOT be adopted because it breaks 0-conf transactions and needlessly imposes extra development costs on existing merchants
Please feel free to post below the reasons why you voted on this topic in particular.