Forum rules
Due to incessant ICO threads being posted in this sub-forum, all ICO Announcement threads must be posted only within the 'ICO Announcements' sub-forum; posting ICO threads here in Altcoins is no longer permitted. Any ICO threads posted here will be moved, and continuing to flout the rules will result in your account being banned.

Bitcoin.com is not responsible for any of the ICO's posted or promoted on this forum.
Users are responsible for their own safety and security on any link they choose to click on, or external site they wish to engage with.

None of the ICO's linked anywhere on this forum are endorsed by Bitcoin.com; users must do their own due diligence on any company / site linked to within this forum.
User avatar
youcef.mahdjoub
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:16 pm

32MB Blocks: The Newest (Old) Solution to Bitcoin Scalability

Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:26 pm

There has been an ongoing Bitcoin block size debate, and most recently a radical, old idea resurfaced: instead of increasing the block size from 1MB to 2,4 or 8MB, the protocol should be changed to accommodate 32MB blocks. This probably pissed off Bram Cohen.

Are 32MB Blocks Too Big?
Here’s why that’s not a radical idea: it’s how Satoshi Nakamoto, creator of Bitcoin, for a time had designed Bitcoin before settling on a 1MB transaction size — a decision which, perhaps, led to Bitcoin being christened “digital gold.”

Calls for large block sizes are not so uncommon: Gavin Andresen himself once did exactly this.

more infos her : http://www.tuto4arab.xyz/blocks-bitcoin-scalability/

Return to “Altcoins / Alternative Cryptocurrencies”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests