If there are no leaders, you get a choppy discussion such as what's been going on with Blockchain and the great debate. Everybody splits in different directions and then you are 10 steps behind.
To be fair, a ruler using false authority obtained via violence/coercion and a leader can be, and are, two very different things. Government as a monopoly on violence in a given geographical area (the definition of government) is unnecessary and destructive.If there are no leaders, you get a choppy discussion such as what's been going on with Blockchain and the great debate. Everybody splits in different directions and then you are 10 steps behind.
Someone just needs to build a lie detector test that works no matter what, then we can grill the politicians to see if they are really there to serve and help the people, or their own agenda
Leaders are good, some are bad.
To be fair, a ruler using false authority obtained via violence/coercion and a leader can be, and are, two very different things. Government as a monopoly on violence in a given geographical area (the definition of government) is unnecessary and destructive.If there are no leaders, you get a choppy discussion such as what's been going on with Blockchain and the great debate. Everybody splits in different directions and then you are 10 steps behind.
Someone just needs to build a lie detector test that works no matter what, then we can grill the politicians to see if they are really there to serve and help the people, or their own agenda
Leaders are good, some are bad.
Agreed!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Return to “Politics & Society”
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 2 guests