When you get a lot of ideas, that's great. Now we need to understand how viable it is and has a chance of success.
Version I Sensitive Arbitrator
I always keep close to me guys who have thin sence of feellings. As a rule, these are people with a subtle perception of the world. Designers, programmers, mathematicians, musicians-composers, directors.
Someone prefers to take advice from successful businessmen - in my opinion their nose is well detacte of a potentially profitable project, with an understandable associative series, but it does not always capture a shade of exclusivity / uniqueness. That is, asterisks such as CryptoKittes can hardly be perceived by them from first sight.
Version II Himself a director
Over time, anyone who devotes enough time to the question What is true, What is not in matters of aesthetics surrounding things begin feell a sense of purity of invented. Then there is no need for filtering by the third-party Arbitrators.
Nevertheless, the periodic reference to their replicas calibrate the inner ear.
Version III Closing of own needs
It makes no sense to force yourself to look for an idea only for getting the jackpot.
To receive a reward from the world, you need to generate a useful work - for this it is enough to feel what is not enough for you personally - a win-win option.
There is not enough interactive things in the crypto market? - make games.
It's not enough cyber-security for your wallets? -create a unique purse.
Too boring and ordinary format of events? - organize a techno stand-up.
P.S. Empty generating of meanings and ideas is fatal, you should be productive.
Ideology is just a fuel.