More censorship from Bitcoin,com & Bitmain!

[SpaceMonkey]

https://twitter.com/AaronvanW/status/884084716122644480

https://twitter.com/AaronvanW/status/884086039471640579

[Fremont]

Yawn.

Nothing to do with Bitcoin.com, although I should point out that you do always write "Bitcoin,com", presumably as you are not permitted to write "Bitcoin.com" over on the censored fora which you frequent. Funny that you're so indoctrinated by actual censorship you continue to utilise those tactics to avoid censorship here where you are not actually censored. Hilarious!!

[SpaceMonkey]

thanks for all the damage Roger. Fees went up so much that the poorest people on earth werent able to buy food with bitcoin because of you. Are you even aware of that?

[Fremont]

thanks for all the damage Roger. Fees went up so much that the poorest people on earth werent able to buy food with bitcoin because of you. Are you even aware of that?

Again with that image - you can't even engage in discussion to back up your arguments. Not entirely surprising but it's getting rather old at this stage.

See here:
post70562.html#p69829

And this isn't Roger but you already know that. You're an odd troll, LiteCoinGuy.

[Possum577]

SpaceMonkey / Aaron,

Maybe you got denied because you troll the Forum with accusations of censorship but don't actually present any facts to prove that your views have been muted.

What views do you have? State them here for all of us to read.

Why are your views so outrageous (to you) that you believe people on this forum would want to silence you?

Any examples? You gotta give us facts or didn't happen. And we're all here, waiting for you to share those facts. I've asked you before to share what your views are, share instances of censorship and I don't think you've responded.

We're still waiting...

And by the way, press passes getting committed to long before an event such as this occurs is very typical. There's nothing shady about that.

https://twitter.com/AaronvanW/status/884084716122644480

https://twitter.com/AaronvanW/status/884086039471640579

[GreyWyvern]

LOL, even if they DID specifically choose to deny a particular press outfit a press pass, that's not censorship. I really don't think you know what the word means.

[grabberfish]

And this isn't Roger but you already know that. You're an odd troll, LiteCoinGuy.

He's a lying fucking troll. I got in trouble for saying that a few months back, but I stand by my comments.

[Possum577]

Spacemonkey, we're still waiting.

Let's talk about your claims. Censorship isn't a trivial topic, let's talk about where you're seeing it. Talking about it in the open will benefit the entire community here.

I'm still waiting...still waiting...

[patrick.miller]

LOL, even if they DID specifically choose to deny a particular press outfit a press pass, that's not censorship. I really don't think you know what the word means.

It's not that they denied it, it's that they lied about the reason for doing so and got caught lying.

When BitcoinMagazine requests a press pass, and the organizers lie about why they are rejecting the press pass application, that is perfectly their right to do so. It's also censorship. That would be denying them an opportunity to observe and express an opinion. While not the most malicious form of censorship, it's still a low blow.

That said, I don't believe this has anything to do with Bitcoin.com or Bitmain.