TheBitcoinStrip.com managed to track down the infamous HufflePuff for an interview:
https://thebitcoinstrip.com/blog/interv ... acker.html
But is this the real HufflePuff?
It would probably be very easy to verify if this guy was real or not, just ask him to sign the address the stolen coins went to.I suppose it not the real one and i assume that everyone could be hufflepuff no one could able to verify his legitimacy on that site maybe the site owner just making some false news just to bring traffice to his website.TheBitcoinStrip.com managed to track down the infamous HufflePuff for an interview:
https://thebitcoinstrip.com/blog/interv ... acker.html
But is this the real HufflePuff?
Let me do a little digging, maybe try get the interviewer here to explain why no signed address was mentioned and ask how this interview came about.It would probably be very easy to verify if this guy was real or not, just ask him to sign the address the stolen coins went to.
I suppose it not the real one and i assume that everyone could be hufflepuff no one could able to verify his legitimacy on that site maybe the site owner just making some false news just to bring traffice to his website.
A signed address will not give the hackers identity away but will confirm he is the hacker or at the very least closely connected with the hacker, quite safe to do for him, why the interviewer did not ask for this i don't know.
If the interviewer would be very serious with this matter for sure he would asked signed messsaged on the address that have been used in the hacking incident in able to show in public about his legitimate news in his website.. If theres no solid proof, everyone could possibly claim with this thing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest