Feedback: Bitcoin GAMES - Sig Campaign

[Possum577]

Just a note to share my praise for the Bitcoin GAMES signature campaign.

I know this is a trial period to see if signature campaigns can exist here. And I'm not a part of this one, so consider these objective comments.

1. Controlling the max participants and keeping tight control from the Manager level is the best way to keep post quality as high as it should be. One can't control the ideas and thoughts each campaigner has, but active management does ensure that the quality of posts are heading in the right direction.

2. Keeping exact payment rate a secret is brilliant! You've given people the max amount possible to earn in a week and basing payment on post quality adds an element of quality control with each campaigner. When each campaigner is writing they need to be thinking about how constructive their comments are because it will directly effect their payment.

3. Campaign management is very responsive

This is a great pilot signature campaign on the Forum. We can all learn from the mistakes made in the past, elsewhere.

[Possum577]

Quick update, I've had three weeks in this campaign now.

The campaign is solid! Reliable payments. Payments shift each week based on the quantity and quality of my posts, as it should be. This keeps me posting regularly and constructively.

What experiences do the rest of you have?

I think this campaign has cracked the code to balancing payments for posts!

[samir09]

offering a cash incentive to respondents in return for feedback, these companies can to do a task (such as viewing an ad, downloading an app or trying out a new game)