The Bitcoin.com mining pool is signalling for both BU and Segwit2x. But not regular Segwit (BP 141).Why the mining pool bitcoin.com does not report segwit2x but BU?
Can you please elaborate it for me. why SegWit2x over UASF?I approve of Segwit2x for now, it's the best thing on the table that looks like getting implemented.
I am defiantly not a fan of this UASF nonsense.
Yeah I agree with your point, but it is possible when segWit2x get signalIt might not be the perfect ideal solution but something needs to be done desperately. I just hope there are no unforeseen road bumps at the time of activation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests