I highly disagree. There is a huge difference between recommending 1 wallet/exchange to new users based on payments and showing a transparent (with disclaimer) advertisement in the footer. Running ads to earn some income or to cover server/DDoS-protection costs isn't a huge problem. Recommending users wallets/exchanges purely based on payments, even if that option isn't the best, is a problem. BTW I already expressed my opinion about that in another topic and Roger said he will "likely" change some things about that - so that would be great.I think this is hilarious since bitcoin.org bashed bitcoin.com for having ads on the page.
I'm pretty sure I saw Paycoin and other Garza scam related advertisements on bitcointalk which theymos also runs....I think this is hilarious since bitcoin.org bashed bitcoin.com for having ads on the page.
Ps, if the advertisements on bitcoin.org end up being misleading and/or intrusive, etc. I will be the first one to complain. But initially by looking at that github discussion, I don't think there is much of a problem with it and I think there is a very clear difference with the "ads" on bitcoin.com atm.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests