If you looked previously bitkilo forgot a thread and when he added that thread it caused the votes to reset essentially.What happened?
Pretty sure i had 1 vote for farmed accounts thread?
How does that answer my question? I did read previously....caused the votes to reset essentially.What happened?
Pretty sure i had 1 vote for farmed accounts thread?
No at the time when they reseted it was all back to 0 some people recasted their votes which lead up to the now current votes. So your votes aren't the only one that was reset.How does that answer my question? I did read previously....caused the votes to reset essentially.What happened?
Pretty sure i had 1 vote for farmed accounts thread?
All 21 votes "reset" except mine "essentially," is that what you are saying?
Bitkilo said he had "been through all the nomination 3 times now and all are there"
But as i said, "sure i had 1 vote for farmed accounts thread?" so maybe he missed it?
Or as Bitkilo also said, which seemed contradictory to me "guess there is no option but to start the voting again"
So did the vote start again, all 21 votes being recast today?
No that "person that voted for you the first time probably didn't vote yet again" is not what has happened.No at the time when they reseted it was all back to 0 some people recasted their votes which lead up to the now current votes. So your votes aren't the only one that was reset.
So the person that voted for you the first time probably didn't vote yet again.
I have not voted this time yet, i did before the restart so that could be it.No that "person that voted for you the first time probably didn't vote yet again" is not what has happened.No at the time when they reseted it was all back to 0 some people recasted their votes which lead up to the now current votes. So your votes aren't the only one that was reset.
So the person that voted for you the first time probably didn't vote yet again.
Either Bitkilo has missed it,
or whoever did vote has now voted differently.
Thanks, i'll wait for Bitkilo to explain.
"Restart"? Sorry i'm still a bit confused here.I have not voted this time yet, i did before the restart so that could be it.
Ok i think you are misunderstanding what had to happen, i will explain."Restart"? Sorry i'm still a bit confused here.I have not voted this time yet, i did before the restart so that could be it.
You said you had "been through all the nomination 3 times now and all are there" Yet yours aren't?
"guess there is no option but to start the voting again"
So were all 21 votes were voided and "recast" by members, or did you mean "continue" voting on your amended list?
You have to make all 5 of your votes at once as stated in the op :pHey quick question,,
I haven't voted yet, do I need to make all my votes at once? Or can I vote for 1 or two, then come back later and vote for the rest?
I haven't quite decided who to vote for yet.
I hate luck. I really do.20 more days till the voting periods up put your votes in if you havent already jusding by current votes already see the winners then it will be up to luck
Well then at this current moment when the voting period has ended you gotta hope to be lucky, mabye if your lucky enough and your 25% prevails you will like luck more xDI hate luck. I really do.20 more days till the voting periods up put your votes in if you havent already jusding by current votes already see the winners then it will be up to luck
Unfortunately the forum and other bitcoin.com domains have been under ddod attacks for the last few days.Hey everyone,
Why has this forum been down for the last 3 days?
Good job on 8 votes nasty!!
Thanks. It looks like we're seeing a good % of the votes. Not sure I like the "luck" aspect of this contest, but perhaps the finalists will be able to agree on something a little more fair.Good job on 8 votes nasty!!
If you're referring to coin owners, remember that they have to have an account on the forum prior to the end of thread the voting stage.Thanks. It looks like we're seeing a good % of the votes. Not sure I like the "luck" aspect of this contest, but perhaps the finalists will be able to agree on something a little more fair.Good job on 8 votes nasty!!
In the meantime, I guess I should encourage NastyFans to also vote for this thread, so that we have 2 chances.
project-development/nasty-mining-pool-coins-t1020.html
I'm definitely willing to negotiate the prize if I do manage to be one of the winning four.Thanks. It looks like we're seeing a good % of the votes. Not sure I like the "luck" aspect of this contest, but perhaps the finalists will be able to agree on something a little more fair.Good job on 8 votes nasty!!
In the meantime, I guess I should encourage NastyFans to also vote for this thread, so that we have 2 chances.
project-development/nasty-mining-pool-coins-t1020.html
Thanks. It looks like we're seeing a good % of the votes. Not sure I like the "luck" aspect of this contest, but perhaps the finalists will be able to agree on something a little more fair.Good job on 8 votes nasty!!
In the meantime, I guess I should encourage NastyFans to also vote for this thread, so that we have 2 chances.
project-development/nasty-mining-pool-coins-t1020.html
If that's how you feel its fine, but the rules are probably alright to the majority of people who joined and I'm one of them. The staff voting for the best thread was bad by itself. With the added addition of the block choosing the prizes makes it transparent and easy to decide the winner. I'm personally glad at how he rules are right now. You are also basically accusing the moderators of not being able to do their jobs properly saying that they are allowing members to vote for themselves. Though I've got to agree with you on the allowing of someone who has a massive advantage/user base.This competition is shocking.
So few voters, so untransparent, such a cop out. Not what it said on the can.
I may as well withdraw from the comp? I was never going to get votes i guess.
Working against farmed accounts and scammers doesn't make you very popular with farmed accounts and scammers and their associates.
Speaking honestly is not very popular. This post wont be popular.
So we are left with a few members voting for themselves, and swapping votes for prize shares, or "practically" staff, with a clear advantage, then decided by random hash, assured by Bitkilo that the vote are genuine, no Ver input, except maybe the hiring of OG and the big reputation point rewards dolled out. (anything else?)
Guy's, i'm not blaming anyone for doing anything against the rules here, it is the rules that are wrong/changed.
It is Roger's btc, his forum his rules.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests