Reserving my username, that's all.
So, this is Roger Ver's reinvention of cryptocrypt? Good riddance.
I personally have zero intention to use or contribute to this forum.

I have no idea what Cryptocrypt is, but thanks for the participation!

https://CryptoCrypt.net

How kind, thank you. Still finding my way around here...

Thanks for the updates to https://monerodice.net/. It seems to be working perfectly now.

would it be possibe to change that with code? i mean that all miners have to wait that the block is validated and then move to the next one together?

It is certainly possible to write any code we please, but unless the protocol were changed to limit this, there would need to be some really good ...

Here to watch this hilarious clusterfuck, I'm here to watch this blow up and watch Roger go back to jail.

Glad to see ElectricMucus around here.
The stuff is sticky and a bit gross, but there's nothing like it to grab the electric debris and sneeze it out.

There are some problems with max block size scaling that are pretty technical and not easily discussed (because they describe vulnerabilities that could be exploited).

I am grateful that the "debate" is happening and that it is continuing to happen. The Mob rule of 'consensus' is just fine, except ...

I agree that valuing a life in money can be a problem, but this is more normal than war. It is done for simple business reasons by insurance and risk management people to determine how much to spend on reducing risks.

War is another thing entirely.
The big and important difference with bitcoin ...

Yes, it was quite possibly me that btc discussed this with at an LA Satoshi Square. So some details on why I make such a claim:

Wars of violence where soldiers will accept non-monetary payments to sacrifice their life for their rulers there is advantage.
This isn't new. Some will fight for medals ...