Search found 3 matches

Go to advanced search

by edmundedgar
Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:58 am
Forum: Bitcoin XT
Topic: Mike Hearn on BitcoinXT
Replies: 14
Views: 18911

Re: Mike Hearn on BitcoinXT

all i know is he is bad at testing code.

do you really want bad code testers behind the reigns of a multibillion dollar cap (potentially trillions and quadrillions) transaction network?

Are you still talking about the Berkeley DB fork? Like I say it was a long-standing bug in the previous ...
by edmundedgar
Fri Oct 30, 2015 2:46 pm
Forum: Development & Technical Discussion
Topic: Compatibility requirements for hard or soft forks
Replies: 2
Views: 4398

Re: Compatibility requirements for hard or soft forks

Weighing in with my not-particularly-informed bikeshed-colour opinions since this seems like a reasonable place for them...

It seems nice to support these theoretical past transactions if it's practical (eg max 1 >0.1 MB tx per block, or is that too complex?) but I think people can get too carried ...
by edmundedgar
Wed Oct 28, 2015 4:44 am
Forum: Bitcoin XT
Topic: Mike Hearn on BitcoinXT
Replies: 14
Views: 18911

Re: Mike Hearn on BitcoinXT

Bugs are a normal part of software development.. It has nothing to do with being a bad developer..

Mike has the right intentions and he's working hard for bitcoin, I don't get the level of agression some people feel for him.

My smart phone wallet based on his BitcoinJ is doing a pretty good job ...

Go to advanced search