-
patrickcoin
- Banned
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 10:59 pm
Segwit2x should be approved or not?
Segwit2x approval or disapproved?
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
I approve of Segwit2x for now, it's the best thing on the table that looks like getting implemented.
I am defiantly not a fan of this UASF nonsense.
I am defiantly not a fan of this UASF nonsense.
Please help Ross and his family during this hard time by donating to the https://freeross.org/ fund.
Play at the best provably fair Bitcoin games site here:
games.bitcoin.com
Need a fantastic Bitcoin wallet
Pick up some great Bitcoin.com swag here
-
vanityaddrs
- Nickel Bitcoiner
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
Segwit2x looks almost inevitable now, even though there are a few big names not obliged to follow. At least it's something, and might go without much of a hitch, but a hard fork to 2MB blocks is coming if the software gets out okay without problems, and Bitcoin scaling up is far from over.
As far as I can tell... I could be wrong.
As far as I can tell... I could be wrong.
BTC bc1qthrhmdmfawq6w4lzmjrce3reuxt06pvvnhpkj6
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
Why the mining pool bitcoin.com does not report segwit2x but BU?
Merci
Merci
-
GreyWyvern
- Bronze Bitcoiner
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:12 pm
- Contact: Website Twitter
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
The Bitcoin.com mining pool is signalling for both BU and Segwit2x. But not regular Segwit (BP 141).Why the mining pool bitcoin.com does not report segwit2x but BU?
Estimate the return on a pool.bitcoin.com contract: http://www.greywyvern.com/code/javascri ... itcoincalc
-
Rmcdermott927
- Bronze Bitcoiner
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 7:32 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
It might not be the perfect ideal solution but something needs to be done desperately. I just hope there are no unforeseen road bumps at the time of activation.
-
Neoclassical
- Banned
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2017 3:40 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
Have you read this guys?
https://nchain.com/en/blog/illusion-sca ... d-witness/
What do you think?
Looking int unbiased responses only.
https://nchain.com/en/blog/illusion-sca ... d-witness/
What do you think?
Looking int unbiased responses only.
We don't need no centralisation. 
-
patrickcoin
- Banned
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 10:59 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
Can you please elaborate it for me. why SegWit2x over UASF?I approve of Segwit2x for now, it's the best thing on the table that looks like getting implemented.
I am defiantly not a fan of this UASF nonsense.
-
patrickcoin
- Banned
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 10:59 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
Yeah I agree with your point, but it is possible when segWit2x get signalIt might not be the perfect ideal solution but something needs to be done desperately. I just hope there are no unforeseen road bumps at the time of activation.
-
patrickcoin
- Banned
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 10:59 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
Thanks guys for posting your views.
-
patrickcoin
- Banned
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 10:59 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
We can discuss more on the topic if anyone has few more pointers to make SegWit2x understand well please mention it here
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
No, the last bloc 476600 mined by bitcom.com signaled BU and NYA but not segwit2x (BIP91).
But why ? Thechnical issue ?
But why ? Thechnical issue ?
-
patrickcoin
- Banned
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 10:59 pm
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
great it helped youokay! now I understand the things
-
kingcoinbase
- Nickel Bitcoiner
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2017 2:51 am
Re: Segwit2x should be approved or not?
There is no any other option besides Segwit2x actually. That's the only reason I would accept it.
Return to “Bitcoin Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: gaabytzu and 7 guests