User avatar
SpaceMonkey
Banned
Banned
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 6:36 pm

Study estimated that 8mb blocks would exclude 95% of existing nodes within 6 months

Wed Jul 12, 2017 10:34 am

https://twitter.com/TuurDemeester/statu ... 3913899009

If you want Paypal 2.0, make blocks really big, so that people have to buy a 20k USD pc to run a node. That is also what the scammer Craig Wright said and Roger supports his ideas.

Poor people can eat dirt, Roger wants more money. :?
Visit bitcoin.org for free and censorship free informations without any business interests!

User avatar
GreyWyvern
Bronze Bitcoiner
Bronze Bitcoiner
Posts: 376
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 8:12 pm

Donate BTC of your choice to 1Db3ACR6PpK5pkMFMn3DAErQ47y9zhxSPo

Contact: Website Twitter

Re: Study estimated that 8mb blocks would exclude 95% of existing nodes within 6 months

Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:58 pm

You've always been telling us that we shouldn't trust the miners that are in bed with BU.

So why should we trust a study from a miner that's in bed with Core and Blockstream?

Is it because you can't recognise your own confirmation bias?
Estimate the return on a pool.bitcoin.com contract: http://www.greywyvern.com/code/javascri ... itcoincalc

User avatar
Possum577
Bronze Bitcoiner
Bronze Bitcoiner
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:34 pm

Donate BTC of your choice to 1Exx48BUTb57hPND67Mt5WwPXiTA9CjoEs

Re: Study estimated that 8mb blocks would exclude 95% of existing nodes within 6 months

Thu Jul 13, 2017 4:07 am

You've always been telling us that we shouldn't trust the miners that are in bed with BU.
Contrary, this study doesn't prove Core, it proves Bitcoin Unlimited needs to happen indefineitly....and then again...and then again.

Spacemonkey, restricting transaction throughput continues to make bitcoin headed down a path to irrelevance. Why do you think this isn't an eventuality?

Are you going to answer any questions?
Image

Return to “Bitcoin Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests