Wonderful, and big news!CEO of the world's largest Bitcoin wallet, Blockchain.info is now publicly supporting Bitcoin Classic:
https://twitter.com/OneMorePeter/status ... 2675516416
The goal is to provide multiple implementations for Bitcoin.What is the end goal of this endeavour? I read the roadmap page but couldn't find anything concrete.
Are you planning on making a new coin? Or jumping on one of the forks if there is a BTC HF?
That doesn't really answer my question. I know as much as I did before.The goal is to provide multiple implementations for Bitcoin.What is the end goal of this endeavour? I read the roadmap page but couldn't find anything concrete.
Are you planning on making a new coin? Or jumping on one of the forks if there is a BTC HF?
The network is very unhealthy with just one implementation. Bitcoin is not software, it is just expressed in software.
Bitcoin is a protocol, not software. I can be expressed in software, though.What does "provide multiple implementations for Bitcoin" mean?
Because I still don't know what exactly it is you plan to do, and now you're talking down to me.Bitcoin is a protocol, not software. I can be expressed in software, though.
Having a good platform for companies to use Bitcoin will help it grow, and this is something I'm working on.
I don't know why you keep talking about other coins.
Is there still any hope for this?New project by JToomim is being developed to bring back democracy to Bitcoin development and honor Satoshi's original vision.
This is a copy paste from the JToomim post where he explains it.
***
The central principles of Bitcoin Classic are twofold:
1. Make decisions democratically with user and miner input.
2. Keep true to Satoshi's vision of Bitcoin. Scale on-chain capacity to exceed demand as long as it's safe.
Point 1 will be implemented via technology like http://bitcoinclassic.consider.it.
Point 2 will be implemented via blocksize increases and the hard work needed to make them safe. We will be starting with a hard fork option that starts at 2 MB.
We will be basing our work primarily off of Core's master branch. Right now we've got a quick prototype https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic/pull/1 based on BitPay's 0.11.2-big-blocks version, but we've only invested about 15% of our hours into that branch.
The hard fork will be based on Gavin's BIP101 code in order to include consensus detection and some limits on block verification cost (e.g. bytes hashed). Currently, we're using a 2 MB in 2016, 4 MB in 2018 approach, with linear interpolation, but we're open to more specific input from miners and users.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4 ... lassic_to/
Is there still any hope for this?
Is a very good idea. CongratulationsCEO of the world's largest Bitcoin wallet, Blockchain.info is now publicly supporting Bitcoin Classic:
https://twitter.com/OneMorePeter/status ... 2675516416
https://twitter.com/rogerkver/status/688159041839742977
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests